DON'T TORTURE ME
AND PUT TO DEATH
 
 

That is my only request, that at the last stage don't torture me and put to death.

[S.P.Room Conversation November 3, 1977, Vrndavana]

Note: Why would Srila Prabhupada make this request unless he felt his "disciples" intentions were in fact to torture him and put him to death?

 

That means you are thief. You are already.

Otherwise why I say that "Thou shall not commit theft"?

Prabhupada: I mean to say that Lord Jesus Christ said, "Thou shall not kill." So, what kind of men were there that Lord Christ had to request them not to kill? That means they were killers. Suppose if somebody's thief, and if I give him some good instruction, I say "You should not commit theft." That means you are thief. You are already. Otherwise why I say that "Thou shall not commit theft"? A naughty child is disturbing. I say, "My dear child, don't do this." Similarly, when Christ said, "Thou shall not kill," that means he said amongst people who were in the habit of killing. Is it not?
Carol: Hmm.
Prabhupada: Now, after taking instruction from Christ, first of all they killed Christ. That means they could not undestand the instruction. Therefore their first business was to kill the instructor. And after that, two thousand years passed, still they are killing. So when they have accepted the teachings of Lord Christ? Can you answer this?
 
[S.P. Room Conversation with Carol Cameron, May 9, 1975, Perth]
 
Note: So, what kind of men are there in apa-Iskcon that Srila Prabhupada had to request them not to torture him and put him to death? That means they are killers and torturers. Suppose if somebody's thief, and if I give him some good instruction, I say "You should not commit theft." That means you are thief. You are already. Otherwise why I say that "Thou shall not commit theft"? A naughty child is disturbing. I say, "My dear child, don't do this." Similarly, when Srila Prabhupada said, "don't torture me and put to death" that means he said amongst people who were in the habit of killing and torturing. Is it not?
 
Now, after taking instruction from Srila Prabhupada, first of all they killed Srila Prabhupada. That means they could not undestand the instruction. Therefore their first business was to kill the instructor. And after that, nearly 25 years passed, still they are killing by changing Srila Prabhupada's transcendental books and blaspheming his pure name [worse than death]
 
So when they have accepted the teachings of Srila Prabhupada? 

Can anyone answer this?
 
 

PRABHUPADA KILLERS PUNISHED

 

Recently I heard Srila Prabhupada say something that made me understand why, some souls, and those who follow and associate with them, cannot understand clearly about Srila Prabhupada's transcendental position and his ability to still initiate and accept disciples and guide them very intimately back to Godhead.

 

Prabhupada: These, these rascals, they thought that "Jesus had a material body. Let us kill him." So Jesus Christ bewildered them more, to remain rascal, that they will continue to think that Jesus had a material body.

Jyotirmayi: Bewildered them?

Yogesvara: Yes, he bewildered them more by saying: "All right, go on thinking like that."

Prabhupada: That is their punishment. They remain always in darkness that Jesus had a material body.

(Room Conversation with devotees about Twelfth Canto Kali-yuga,and Conversation with Guest June 15, 1974, Paris)

Note: These, these rascals, they thought that "Prabhupada has a material body. Let us kill him." So Srila Prabhupada bewildered them more, to remain rascal, that they will continue to think that Srila Prabhupada had a material body. That is their punishment. They remain always in darkness that Srila Prabhupada had a material body.

Why you are, I mean to say, killing others

and yourself by interpreting Bhagavad-gita?

 So if you read Bhagavad-gita as it is, that is mad-asrayah. But if you interpret Bhagavad-gita according to your rascal imagination, that is not Bhagavad-gita. Therefore it is called mad-asrayah, "under My protection, as I am tea..." We are therefore presenting Bhagavad-gita as it is. We do not change. Why should you change? What right you have got to change? If Bhagavad-gita is a book of authority, and if I make my own interpretation, then where is the authority? Can you change the lawbook according to your interpretation? Then what is the meaning of that lawbook? That is not lawbook. You cannot change. Similarly, if you accept Bhagavad-gita as the book of authority, you cannot change the meaning. That is not allowed. What right? If you have got some opinion, if you have got some philosophy, you can write in your own book. Why you are, I mean to say, killing others and yourself by interpreting Bhagavad-gita? You give your own thesis in a different way. But these people, they take advantage of the popularity of Bhagavad-gita and interpret in a different way according to their own whims. Therefore people do not understand what is Krsna. That is the difficulty. And the purpose of Bhagavad-gita is to understand Krsna. And all the so-called scholars' and politicians' commentary is to banish Krsna or to kill Krsna--the Kamsa's policy. The Kamsa was always thinking of Krsna, how to kill Him. This is called demonic endeavor. So that will not help you.

(B.G. Lec. 7.1 Hyderabad, 27th April, 1974)

Note: So by interpreting Srila Prabhupada's books like Bhagavad-gita as it is, this is killing him again, his followers and themselves.

 

Preaching to Prabhupada killers a useless waste of time.

Innocent child, five years old, Prahlada Maharaja, because he learned from Narada Muni even from the womb of his mother how to become a devotee and from the birth he was a devotee and his father did not like, Hiranyakasipu. Not only he did not like, he was prepared to kill his child in so many ways. That is atheism. Atheists are so much averse, sura-dvisat. They are envious. So to such person the madhyama-adhikari cannot preach because it is useless waste of time. If one is innocent but not envious we can preach there. That will be, I mean to say, fruitful. If we go to atheist and you go on speaking, he will never accept it. So don't waste your time in that way. That is nama-aparadha. But because we have not so much power that we can convert an atheist to become theist or devotee of God That requires special power.

(Srimad-Bhagavatam Lec. 5.5.28 Vrndavana, November 15, 1976)

Note: So the attempt by the various bogus reform groups such as IRM to preach to the Prabhupada killers in apa-Iskcon with a view to convince them to accept Srila Prabhupada is a useless waste of time. They are atheist and will never accept it. So don't waste your time in that way. That is nama-aparadha. Compromised reformers have not so much power to convert an atheist from apa-Iskcon to become theist or Prabhupada follower. That requires special power which only Srila Prabhupada has.