Untitled Document

"Any opinion different from the opinion of the spiritual master is useless. One cannot infiltrate materially concocted

ideas into spiritual advancement. That is deviation."

TRANSLATION: Some of the disciples strictly accepted the orders of the acarya, and others deviated, independently concocting their own opinions under the spell of daivi-maya.

PURPORT: This verse describes the beginning of a schism. When disciples do not stick to the principle of accepting the order of their spiritual master, immediately there are two opinions. Any opinion different from the opinion of the spiritual master is useless. One cannot infiltrate materially concocted ideas into spiritual advancement. That is deviation. There is no scope for adjusting spiritual advancement to material ideas.

TRANSLATION: The order of the spiritual master is the active principle in spiritual life. Anyone who disobeys the order of the spiritual master immediately becomes useless.

PURPORT: Here is the opinion of Srila Krsnadasa Kaviraja Gosvami. Persons who strictly follow the orders of the spiritual master are useful in executing the will of the Supreme, whereas persons who deviate from the strict order of the spiritual master are useless. [C.C. Adi Lila 12.9-10]

Note: So the opinion of Srila Prabhupada is: "And of all sinful activities, actions directed against a pure devotee out of sheer envy are considered extremely severe." and Bogus P.A.D.A. (Puranjana dasa and followers) have an opinion different from the opinion of Srila Prabhupada - That is useless. Puranjana dasa cannot infiltrate materially concocted ideas into spiritual advancement. That is deviation.

Puranjana dasa and followers have made a very severe offense by preaching their deviant view against Srila Prabhupada's clear transcendental words.

Let's look at the whole quote from the Caitanya Caritamrta, and then the P.A.D.A. concoction:

And of all sinful activities, actions directed against a pure devotee out of sheer envy are considered extremely severe.

"O sinful person, envious of pure devotees, I shall not deliver you! Rather, I shall have you bitten by these germs for many millions of years.

PURPORT

We should note herein that all our sufferings in this material world, especially from disease, are due to our past sinful activities. And of all sinful activities, actions directed against a pure devotee out of sheer envy are considered extremely severe. Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu wanted Gopala Capala to understand the cause of his suffering. Any person who disturbs a pure devotee engaged in broadcasting the holy name of the Lord is certainly punished like Gopala Capala. This is the instruction of Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu. As we shall see, one who offends a pure devotee can never satisfy Caitanya Mahaprabhu unless and until he sincerely regrets his offense and thus rectifies it.

(C.C. Adi Lila 17.51)

This brahmana, Gopala Capala, wanted to defame Srivasa Thakura by proving that he was actually a sakta, or a worshiper of Bhavani, the goddess Durga, but was externally posing as a Vaisnava.

(C.C. Adi Lila 17.37-38)

THE P.A.D.A. CONCOCTION

(On the blasphemous statements made about Srila Prabhupada in the Turley Law case)

The idea of "blaming Srila Prabhupada" has also surfaced to a nominal extent in this complaint, but it is not at all to the degree that many so-called "big devotees" blame him.....It is very nominal. Normally, molested children level much more severe insults against their Church, God, etc. Also, as we pointed out, the whole atheistic movement was a reaction to Church abuses in the medieval times. Abuses lead to rejection of the Church, and Srila Prabhupada will confirm this. You have no experience looking at any such cases or history? Also, if you have a better plan to get the GBC in jail for RICO violations, go for it. .....So Turley will do some major harassment, but he is not my paid up lawyer, so I cannot control every move he makes. It is stupid of you to think he will, and it is stupid of you to think I should now attack this man when he needs my testimony for the molest charges, and that is the only way these molest charges will be addressed legally.....Why do I have to compromise with Turley or Nityananda to get things done? Where are the "real warriors" that you infer should do the job? And if I did not do it properly, why didn't you?

thanks Puranjana dasa.

Note: Those persons who want to defame Srila Prabhupada saying he is a crooked leader of a child molester cult while posing as a pure devotee of God are making extremely severe offenses to his lotus feet. Such persons are certainly punished like Gopala Capala. This is Srila Prabhupada's clear opinion!!! Puranjana dasa and followers have a different opinion - they say it is nominal, very nominal. This is their materially concocted idea. This is their DEVIATION.

Those persons who hear and tolerate this blasphemy of His Divine Grace and do nothing will meet with the following reaction.

One who hears blasphemy of the Supreme Personality of Godhead or His devotees should immediately take action or should leave. Otherwise he will be put into hellish life perpetually. There are many such injunctions. Therefore as a regulative principle one should not be unfavorable toward the Lord but always favorably inclined toward Him.

(S.B. 7.1.26)

Note: The interesting point to note in the above PADA CONCOCTION is that Puranjana dasa is openly admitting as early as the 5th of June 2000 that he is compromised with Turley . This would clearly indicate that he was aware of the plaintiffs complaint number 35 against Srila Prabhupada blaming him of being a duplicitous leader of the child molester cult, before it was publicly released on 12th June 7 days later.

The reason for his compromise he says is that they need his testimony for the molest charges. So in other words Puranjana sold out, his desire to kick out tamalt is so strong that he compromises with people who are blaspheming Srila Prabhupada.

Let's look at what Srila Prabhupada says about compromise.

Paramahamsa: Our position in preaching should be to encourage people in all
respects to associate with us.
Prabhupada: Yes.
Paramahamsa: That means sometimes we might have to compromise in certain
ways.
Prabhupada: Why compromise? You don't compromise. Then you associate with
him. If you make compromise, then you associate with him. Then gradually
you'll also go down. When we, when we see some person, we do not associate
with him, but we give him chance to associate with me. Why you should make
compromise? What is the reason? If you know something positively, why should
you make compromise? When people come to talk with me, see me, I don't make
any compromise. Do I make any compromise?
Devotees: No.
Prabhupada: Then why shall we make compromise? That gentleman, Mr. Herbert,
Gene Herbert, he said that "It has taken eighteen years to write these
books." I said, "Still, there are so many mistakes." Immediately I said. And
he could not say anything. Do you remember that?
Devotees: Yes.
Prabhupada: Immediately I said, "Yes, you have labored eighteen years.
Still, there are so many mistakes."
Nitai: Anyone else would have said, "Oh! Very nice."
Prabhupada: (laughs) Eh? I did not say.

(S.P. Morning Walk June 11, 1974, Paris)

Note: So Puranjana should have known positively that Srila Prabhupada was not to blame in any way and was not covering anything up, still dictated my maya he made a compromise. This is his betrayal of Srila Prabhupada.

So what is the result of his making a compromise with Turley ? Srila Prabhupada says:

Why compromise? You don't compromise. Then you associate with him. If you make compromise, then you associate with him. Then gradually you'll also go down.

Note: So Puranjana due to his compromise is associating with Turley and the offensive ex-gurukula children who are blaspheming Srila Prabhupada. Now he is also going down by their association, in other words he is also blaming Prabhupada and is an exremely severe offender. This is shown by his stanch defence of the blasphemers and his attacks on devotees like Sanat prabhu who are trying to save him from his madness by presenting Srila Prabhupada's teachings on the correct Vaisnava behaviour towards blasphemy of the Lord and His devotees.

THAT IS THE WAY OF FALSEHOOD

Prabhupada: That is the way of falsehood. If once you speak something false, then to protect that falsehood you have to take to so many other falsehoods. This is the way of falsehood.
Paramahamsa: One lie leads to another. [S.P. Morning Walk, June 2, 1975, Honolulu]

Note: Because he has betrayed Srila Prabhupada and compromised with the blasphemers, then to protect this falsehood he has taken to the falsehood of trying to say the extreme sinful activity of blaspheming Srila Prabhupada is nominal, very nominal.

CONCLUSION

P.A.D.A. FIRST FALSEHOOD = POSE AS THE DEFENDER OF PRABHUPADA BUT COMPROMISE WITH BLASPHEMERS WHO ARE MAKING EXTREMLY SEVERE OFFENSES TO HIS DIVINE GRACE.

SUCH OFFENSES ARE BEING PROPAGATED ALL OVER THE WORLD AND ARE BEING HEARD BY MILLIONS OF INNOCENT SOULS. PURANJANA DASA CLEARLY REVEALS THAT HE IS MORE CONCERNED ABOUT DESTROYING TAMAL THAN DEFENDING SRILA PRABHUPADA. THEREFORE HE IS A FIRST CLASS OFFENDER (GURU TYAGI) WHO MISLEADS OTHERS BY PRESENTING HIMSELF AS A PRABHUPADA'S DEFENDER.

P.A.D.A. SECOND FALSEHOOD TO COVER THE FIRST = PREACH THAT SUCH BLASPHEMY IS ONLY VERY NOMINAL, AND ATTACK THOSE WHO EXPOSE HIS FALSEHOOD WITH MORE FALSEHOODS, OFFENSIVE LIES AND APA - SIDDHANTIC PHILOSOPHY.

OTHER POINTS.

In regards to Puranjana's compromise with Nityananda dasa (mentioned by him above), this again reveals his betrayal of Srila Prabhupada and Sulocana prabhu.

Puranjana dasa: Again, I also did not have any funding to get the poison forensics done, but as soon as I get Nityananda to do it, Sanat says that I am licking Satsvarupa's boots. He cannot do it, but if someone else does, he bites with his viper venom. Again, if we ever do a poison court case, we will need these forensics. So I get it done, somehow or other, and then you folks harass me because I had to use someone you do not like to get it done?

Note: So Puranjana gets the forensics done with the help of Nityananda's money, which he got from selling Satsvarupa's poison book - The Lilamarta. So again we see Puranjana so driven by his desire to get tamalt out that he supports the most blasphemous writings of satsvarupa.

Let us get a glimpse of Sulocana's feeling of lilamrta:

Sulocana prabhu: No devotee in his right mind should read even one page of "Lilamrta," and those copies that have already been distributed should be recovered and burned.

Note: Here we again clearly see Puranjana's betrayal of Sulocana prabhu. Sulocana prabhu says burn lilamrta and Puranjana says sell lilamrta, poison everyone and give me the money from the profits so i can get tamalt in jail and then sit in his seat.

Another point in regards to Sulocana saying "those copies that have already been distributed should be recovered and burned." that burning was done at Gita Nagari by Sanat prabhu.

Sulocana prabhu: No one will deny that Satsvarupa appears to be glorifying Srila Prabhupada in the Lilamrta. The problem is that, along with the glorification, he has also defamed Prabhupada. In one breath Srila Prabhupada is described being completely transcendental and beyond ordinary emotions, etc., but in the next sentence he is described as being dependent on a Mayavadi, or confused, insecure, etc. This makes the whole thing contradictory, bewildering, and offensive. It takes on the characteristics of milk touched by the lips of a serpent.

Sulocana prabhu: This last statement is the reason that Srila Prabhupada remained in household life: To set the example for us. But Satsvarupa does not make that clear in his "biography." He tries to interpret Srila Prabhupada's activities in a mundane way, making him seem "human" and thereby leading all the readers to hell. Satsvarupa is directly indicating above that Srila Prabhupada had not yet advanced to the point of being transcendental to family attachment. Try and see how offensive this is.

Sulocana prabhu: Such truths should not have to be spoken so openly, but it is necessary to make them clear in order to get his poisonous book, the "Lilamrta," recovered and burned.

Sulocana prabhu: The author, and those who worked with him on the "Lilamrta," have committed a horrendous offense to Srila Prabhupada. If they had tried this same "interpreting the mind" trick with some famous materialist who had died, they would be liable to get hit with a devastating slander lawsuit from the materialists' heirs. So just consider the gravity of what has happened-and is still happening-to Srila Prabhupada's reputation from the distribution of this slanderous book, the "Lilamrta."

Note: So here we see what Sulocana feels about Puranjana and Nityananda's distribution of lilamrta.

Sulocana prabhu: The Mahabhagavata's disciples are never expected to take such quotes and apparent situations and put together a book which tugs on the heartstrings of all of its readers, while at the same time tugging and ripping out the devotional creeper.

Sulocana prabhu: The "Lilamrta" is one of the reasons why this abominable mentality is even possible. Imitation thrones also assists the delusion. Equal worship is another strategy. "Lilamrta" is a contamination at nines so subtle, and so poisonous, that it works on the subconscious without a careless devotee even being aware. This book, and the books of Sridhar Maharaja will both produce results on the same level. Both have the same poisonous effect on one's soul.

Sulocana prabhu: As many of these books as possible should be recovered and destroyed. If not, the authors will be subject to sever punishment, both in this lifetime, and for many future lifetimes to come. And the innocent victims reading these books may have their material existence extended as well.

Note: So Puranjana and Nityananda's actions directly oppose Srila Prabhupada's mission to deliver the fallen souls. By distributing lilamrta they are extending the material existence of the poor souls who read this poisonous book.