THE FALSE REFORMERS OF
"THE HARE KRISHNA SOCIETY"
Dear Hari Katha prabhu, PAMHO. AGTSP.
Yesterday i had a conversation with Kapindra [now the with the Hare Krishna Society] which i wish to describe to you.
I called to clarify what was the situation in regards to PSS New York clearing the debt for all the Srila Prabhupada Lilamrta's, as the e-mails i had repeatedly sent were not replied to.
Kapindra answered the phone and was (like Nimai pandit) not able to give a straight answer about the payments. He then said that the books you had taken to the US were all distributed in a meeting of devotees which took place somewhere in the USA (I think he said LA) Anyway he told me that you all decided to cut out the acknowldgements page of the book. He basically said the reason was that you all found the following statement out of order.
Thanks to Sanat Prabhu for risking his life, exposing the demons crime of poisoning Srila Prabhupada and for striving for several years to wake up the false reform, so called Prabhupada followers, (Pada, Nityananda das et al) that Srila Prabhupada himself had clearly indicated he was being tortured and poisoned “unto death”.
He was saying that i couldn't criticise devotees and that i should be more tolerant of their faults, not simply criticise them. He said that you had all removed this page so that it wouldn't offend Nityananda dasa who would be at the meeting.
I responded that this was not a personal attack but simply stating the facts. Before i elaborated on this point i exposed some hypocrisy in his actions. I said that if we are to over look the faults of other devotees and not criticise why was he not applying this philosophy to me? Why was he now finding fault with me? Surely he must be consistent in his philosophy and overlook my fault also? Why cut out a page of acknowledgements???
To this he had no reasonable answer, simply ramblings.
I then explained to him why the above statement about the false reform was in fact calling a spade a spade. It was very difficult for me to make this point as he was constantly rambling his mantras at me, but i eventually was able to get the question in " Can you glorify Prabhupada and push on his mission and simultaneously blaspheme him by distributing the bogus Lilamrta which is so offensive? Is this logicical that we can claim to reform and at the same time blaspheme???"
To this question he was silent.
He then brought up his previous critical comment that i should not have put my words as an appendix in the back of the Lilamrta as it is. He was speaking in such a way as to imply that i had taken a book already compiled by Prabhupada and reprinted it with my comments. In others words how puffed up i am as to put my words in Prabhupada's book. To this a replied that one devotee here in Manchester was told by me that somebody held this view. He replied (after he had just read the book) some people have the fly mentality and will look for the sores. He advised me not to bother about such envious people. This reminded me of Srila Prabhupada's statement "Let them do something first, then we shall see what is their criticism. Simply criticizing and no work, that is the business of inferior men. So do not be disturbed by them, go on with your work, increasing more and more. Never mind the jackals howl."
I then replied that we should judge by the results. So many devotees are so please with the book and ultimately His Divine Grace gave his conclusion to me personally:
My Guru Maharaja is very pleased. As soon as a book comes out, he is pleased.
[S.P. Room Conversation, July 26, 1976, London]
Kapindra then used the same mantra as Ravindra used when Sanat was exposing him at the Ratha Yatra. "Why don't you follow the principles then you can talk to me."
Kapindra said that if one is not chanting 16 rounds and following the principles then what he says is not authorised or his vision is contaminated. In others he was saying the same as Ravindra. He wasn't able to refute any of my points so he attacked my character. "You aint following so whatever you say is faulty anyway"
After the conversation i discussed with various friends. Here are some points to consider:
* Who authorised you all to cut the page? (If you say Prabhupada, you have to prove how he revealed this to you. In other words show the philosophical basis for your actions)
* If Prabhupada has said the book is pleasing to his Guru Maharaja then what right do you have to amend the book even one sentence, what to speak of cutting two pages? Isn't this being over intelligent and simply offensive to Srila Prabhupada and the previous Acaryas?
* Krsna das prabhu said he found it improper to write in such a sacred book, why does Kapindra cut pages from it?
* Isn't the cutting of this page a denial of all the people who played their role in churning this book out? All the devotees mention played a very important role in making this book manifest. [For example the Antya lila of Prabhupada's life in the Lilamrta was originally uncovered and distributed at Ratha Yatra parades in draft form by Sanat. If it wasn't for him the clear picture as told by Prabhupada himself about his departure lila may never have appeared in the the Lilamrta as it is.]
So isn't cutting out my acknowledgement of their service an offense to them? What happened to Kapindra's philosophy of tolerance? How intolerant can you get to simply deny the existence of a persons sincere service?
* Prabhupada words were on page 399 who authorized you to cut them out???
* Would you have deleted if Kapindra and his Hare Krishna Society were acknowledged?
* Why did none of you not mention this point when you first read the book? Why now changing? Isn't this duplicity, simply to achieve some agenda in your relationship with Nityananda dasa and co. and the formation of your new reform movement "The Hare Krishna Society"? If you were so concerned about my so called offending Nityananda dasa and co. why not protest immediatly???
Your servant Mukunda dasa.
P.S. Nityananda das also got a complete copy of the book and said it was wonderful and ingenious. He got a copy from Naveen Krishna dasa.
Sanat dasa: but it just reveals that otaykapindra IS THE FALSE REFORM that has been exposed. he can't tolerate even an indirect reference to this valid point. birds of a feather . . .
Mukunda dasa: So it's now official, Kapindra and his followers have teamed up with the false reformers to form "The Hare Krishna Society"
They even have an Oath of Allegiance to Srila Prabhupada to signed. They just want their followers to put their allegiance to them and their false reform in writing. Anyone who does so is simply a fool with no real faith in their direct relationship with Srila Prabhupada and his ability to empower them to do direct service apart from such pseudo societies.
And what is the benefit of being a leader of these fools anyway?
Everyone wants to become leader and some followers. Caitanya Mahaprabhu says that "What is the use of becoming leader of these fools?"
[Bhagavad-gita Lecture, 4.10 Calcutta, September 23, 1974]
This business of cutting out 2 pages of the Lilamrta as it is by Kapindra dasa has very great significance.
It is is again completely unconstitutional behaviour like his attempt to ban our centre in England from the Prabhupada Sankirtana Society because we were fighting to defend Srila Prabhupda from blasphemy [see HAS THE "SWAMI" TITLE GONE TO KAPINDRA'S HEAD "QUARTERS" ?]
This act reveals his actual support for the bogus reformers and his total contempt for devotees like Sulocana prabhu who have uncompromisingly fought against the sinister movement [It is interesting to note he has never read the GURU BUSINESS or distributed it to his foolish followers]
The concept of Lilamrta as it is came from Sulocana prabhu and was manifested by the joint desire of devotees (few who were mentioned in the Acknowledgements page) desiring to Glorify and defend Prabhupada's honour.
So in the name of not offending a person who has knowingly sold a most offensive book about Prabhupada he offends His Divine Grace and souls who have being instrumental in fighting for his honour.
Of course he doesn't care about Nityananda dasa but sees him as someone who can be helpful to his new "Hare Krishna Society". Such duplicity and self puja consciousness makes him blind to what's really going on in the real mission and what we have to to to counteract it for the benefit of the worlds population. Simply cow dung skull, but acting with so much authority. Whimsically banning temples, chopping up authorised books, kicking on the face of those who have done service without compromise.
This is what happens when you want so much to be recognised for making your world wide "Hare Krishna Society". Maybe he can be saved - GET READING THE GURU BUSINESS padabu !!! And pass it on to your sheep.
A little example
With some friends you struggle very hard to prepare a nice but small Prasadam feast with the meditation to distribute this feast to starving souls. As you are preparing this feast Srila Prabhupada keeps coming in the kitchen and guiding you how to put it all together. When the offering is made Srila Prabhupada tells you that it was very pleasing to his Guru Maharaja.
You then start to distribute the Prasadam and many souls are relieved to taste the nectar. Then one soul who is serving out the mercy starts to criticise the preparation work (our kicking out of the kitchen someone who was trying to put dog stool in the pots) and a part of the feast. He then without any authority throws away this small part of the feast in the name of defending the dog stool thrower.
What do you think Srila Prabhupada and His Guru Maharaja would say about this ???
To make comments like those mentioned in an
acknowledgement section of a book meant to glorify Srila
Prabhupada is simply in bad taste. There IS a time and
place for these kind of comments. But what can you
He was beaten severely by the supporters of this cult for exposing their crime of poisoning Srila Prabhupada.
When Puranjana and Nityananda were told by Sanat that Tamal was the Ravana that Prabhupada was speaking of, neither of them accepted this and called his suggestions offensive. Nityananda even laughed heartily when he heard Sanat was beaten at the Ratha Yatra parades, saying that this was his reaction for making such offensive propaganda.
Sanat eventually got through to Puranjana somewhat after $3,000 of phone calls to accept that Prabhupada was poisoned. Sanat suggested that they get the Bengali section of the conversations translated to see what other things Prabhupada was saying.
Puranjana and Nityananda then only became convinced about the poisoning after hearing whispers - Prabhupada's own direct statement were not enough!!!
While they got more and more into the poison issue Sanat suddenly didn't exist. No recognition of his waking them up from their false reform at the risk of his life. Another factor is that Nityananda was selling the offensive Lilamrta's while all the while shouting about reforming ISKCON and exposing the poisoners.
What we have to understand is that "For one who has being Honoured Dishonour is worse than death" So looking at Puranjana and Nityananda they have both, while seemly working to expose corruption being simultaneously involved in propagating a more severe type of corruption themselves - namely blasphemy of Srila Prabhupada.
So i have acknowledged this service by Sanat prabhu as this is actual glorification of Srila Prabhupada. It may not be palatable for those who wanted to jump from the frying pan (Apa-iskcon) to the fire (PADA, Hare Krishna Society) but we are sure it is pleasing to Srila Prabhupada. These people who are criticising us for pointing out this obvious hypocrisy in the name of reform may have a change of heart when they wake up to the fact that were saved from the fire.
Your fallen servant and ever so humble life saver Mukunda dasa (association with is sure to enlighten you padabhu)
P.S. Also while Nityananda das was propagating the offensive Lilamrta he completely neglected to sell even one copy of Guru Business by Sulocana prabhu. Yes the beautiful expose by Sulocana prabhu of that sacred cow Satsvarupa cannot be tolerated padabhu's but Tamal's a real demon right?
And mr. puranjan pada licks the butt of old Nityannada dasa to get him to pay for the forensics to be done on the poison whispers.
What a faithful brother of Sulocana eh? Butt licker of the man who denies Sulocana's work and propagates the book Sulocana says should be burned. Is the fog clearing now? Now you understand why Prabhupada says the Lilamrta As It Is is pleasing to his Guru Maharaja, yes from 1 to page 400 - ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS INCLUDED !!! Kapindra over intelligent editing free!!!!!
Sanat dasa: actually, puranjana didn't become 'convinced of the Poisoning of the Spiritual Master until an old friend of his named abhinandana in Houston woke up after 20 years slumber. Abi's awakening was apparently precipitated by his seeing Pd's story on the internet on July 6th, 1997 about how several 'devotees' (of Tamal) brutally attacked me in Washington DC RY while videotaping my exposing tamal, and Co.'s torture of Jagat Guru, Srila Prabhupada in 1977. They tore up flyers (of Prabhupada's own words from SPConv.), smashed a sign that had pictures of SP, stepped on Prabhupada's face, kicked, punched and slapped me, etc. Pada reported this, as i was 'representing' the pada org., and had his address and phone number, email, etc. on the flyers; and the videotape reveals that i was thinking puranjana to be "the premier" reformer in the iskcon world.
Unfortunately, Mr. Puranjana -- who had been praising my fearless and unprecedented activities since early 1993 (just a few weeks after my Dec. 16, 1992, 200 - page ISKCON Farm Report had been published and distributed around the world), and had even published an article next to my own in a local Juniata County, Pa. newspaper, in which he heartily extolled the virtues of [my] exposing the miscreant leaders of ISKCON farm who harassed the cows and cowherds - was firmly opposed to my inserting a paragraph in my July 4th, 1997 flyer stating that "tamal IS Ravana". After that episode, i started wondering what truly motivated Puranjana. And i openly disclosed this fact to him. I did not speak behind his back, or create an uproar. I matter-of-factly told him his shocking response was hypocritical, and seemed to me at the time to contradict every thing he had hitherto espoused and explicated. My wife couldn't console me, and i even discussed this at length with my family counselor. We had accepted "SRi Puranjana" as the representative of Sulocana and a sincere Prabhupadanuga warrior (in fact, Puranjana himself coined the term 'Prabhupadanuga' after reading my ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS section/praise of HDG Srila Prabhupada, and using that term, Prabhupadanuga in every paragraph - later, KK Desai and others coined another phrase i invented: "BACK TO PRABHUPADA". Anyway, the documents reveal what i'm saying here very clearly. We have innumerable documents showing Pd's full hearted acceptance of our role in exposing the 'evildoers'. Letters fr5om him, Yasoda, Gauridasa, Hansaduta, KK Desai, etc.,etc. from around the worlds (and from other cowherds in the movement and outside the movement.) And similarly ALL of our writings, videos, etc. are suffused with statements extolling Pd's role in exposing the miscreant gurus, etc.
(And, backing up a little, shortly before this episode -- and after i had spent over $3 K phoning Mr. Puranjana over 4 years importuning him to take seriously that Srila Prabhupada, the Spiritual Master, was indeed explaining that tamal and co. were torturing and poisoning Him unto death -- Mr. PADA told me he didn't even own copy of SPConv. I was so stunned, i walked around my house in Ithaca, NY. for nearly a wekk totally stupefied, and babbling, exclaiming that there was maybe no one sincere left in the world to talk to [except my therapist and psychiatrist!!] , and that i had been mislead yet again by someone with false motives who cared so little about the real truth, and didn't mind cheerleading me on and on and on to do all the front line dirty work and fighting, while he sat back comfortably on the internet taking trying to take credit for the salvos flying over my head and into my face for acting on Prabhupada's advice to "go call them all ill names, urinate on their face rascals!", etc.]
Anyway, everything changed drastically after i got beaten in Wash DC and Abhinadana woke up and decided that he had in fact heard that Prabhupada said he was poisoned (by Bhakticaru) on Nov. 8, 1977, as he entered SP's apartment. Abhinandana, whom i never met or knew existed, phoned me around July 6 or 7 and told me i had to stop my public demonstrations and immediately arrange to come to Houston and then he'd finance our journey to India where he knew "prominent life members who will help us get this message to the Indian government", etc. He forced me into a threeway converstaion with Houston FBI officials regarding Prabhupada's assassination, and he promised to give me copies of the final weeks' Conv. tapes of SP if i cooperated with him; he was very surprised that i neither had copies of the tapes nor even knew they existed (i figured they had all been destroyed!)
The man was a little crazy, and indeed within a few days i got a call from his Indian-born wife, Dhramistha [i still have their phone number], and this nice lady told me the whole saga of her husband including years of on again off again drug use, etc (which apparently happened because of his attempt to drown the memory of what he'd heard 20 year prior in Vrindavana India) HEY, FOLKS, THIS IS ALL IMPORTANT DOCUMENT, THAT PADA, NITYANANDA, AND ALL THEIR FRIENDS DESPERATELY DON'T WANT TO BE RECORDED HISTORICALLY - NO FRIGGIN WONDER THEY ALL DEMONISE ME EVER SINCE!!. So Mother Dharmistha rings us up all disturbed that she just had to have her husband of many years committed because of his sudden most crazy and dangerous outburst, in which he lashed out violently at their teenage daughter, and etc.
Abhi called me several more times from the funny house, begging me to come down at once and speak on his behalf so they let him go "to do our most important work of avenging Prabhupada's death." I was really thinking he was off at this point, because i didn't know him from Adam and he wanted me to fly to Houston to spring him from the cuckoos nest!!
Soon, Abhi got out and made more calls to us, imploring me to help him in his India project.
Meantime, pada started acting really strange; he told me he was going to make a tape recording about Prabhupada's posioning; i told him that was fine, but would he send me the tapes if he had them. He asked me for the money up front. I sent $260 cash. The tapes came many months later, AFTER PADA had cleverly presented himself as the discoverer of the poison conspiracy, a thing he refused to embrace for several years (him and Nityananda, etc.). But i wassn't interested necessarily in being recognized for revealing this, as long as PADA and others would NOW work conjointly to get the info to the press, to ward off SP's being defamed in the press regarding what i presciently felt would be an upcoming child abuse litigation in which ravindra and tamalt and E. Burke Rochford were conspiring to deflect criticism from the [false] ISKCON gurus and leave Prabhupada holding the bag.
I REMONSTRATED WITH PADA, YASODA AND OTHERS THAT THE TIMING WAS VERY IMPORTANT, And that not much time remained in which to head ravindra and fellow demons off at the pass. Certainly, if SP were seen by the public as a victim of the same miscreants who had covered up decades of child abuse and also abused cows, women and the public, that Srila Prabhupada would be seen as a Christ, not as a cult leader. I strongly urged PADA to give up the tendency to want [false] recognition and become famous for so-called being "first" to reveal the truth of Prabhupada's demise, and to instead use his internet skills to exhort his godbros around the world to amass for public demonstartions and expose' to reveal the Crime of the Millenium, and to circulate petitions everywhere for the Indian Gov't to work to extradite tamal and company to India to face the charges of Guru-Killing and etc. PADA told me forget it, i should do it myself since i was local on East Coast, and etc. I was doing it already. I have video tape also of my distributing literature at Toronto RY in July 17, 1997, and my speaking out to the Indian Political Minister (and handing him one such petition), Amitava Tripathi at the Dec. 3, 1998 meeting at SUNY Cortland, NY. PADA didn't care about educating people properly, nor did Nityananda or Yasoda. Nobody showed any alarm except that i was stating unequivocally now (Sept 97 onward) that "PADA is a hypocrite, is only self-interested, and will do anything for name and fame, doesn't care that Prabhupada was poisoned, only that he should become famous for exposing it!"
By Oct. 1998 the precursor to the Turley lawsuit came out. I had told PADA and Yasoda it was only a matter of little time before the press started blatantly blaming Prabhupada for the crimes of tamal, satshedupe, ravindra and rochford, etc. The Oct. 9, 1998 front page NYTs story by Laurie Goodstein on ISKCON child abuse, proved my suspicion. It openly attacked "the Founder's teachings" for the child abuse. This was mouthed by Rochford, who first, with ravindra's and Mukunda swami's tacit support, published the same thesis in ISKCON JOURNAL in early 1998. Thus they were passing blame onto Srila Prabhupada, along with all the priti laksanam cheerleaders.
PADA went silent. I protested. My protest was recorded in Ithaca Journal (that's a little different from ISKCON Journal, but same initials!); you may view it at our website, Back to Prabhupada; fact is, Prabhupada Himself came to participate in defening the Spiritual Master - and if you hold the picture of Prabhupada's presence up to a light, you can clearly also see the face of Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati.
I exposed the plot very nicely, as i had several times to the persons i believed were sympathetic to Srila Prabhupada.
PADA was in high gear to blast and smear my character now. He sent out newsletters saying i was a cheerleader of satshedupe and another Kirtananda, etc. Simply for calling a spade a spade, and after giving him clear benefit of doubt over many years, AND AMPLE OPPORTUNITIES TO REPENT FOR HIS HYPOCRISY, GIVE IT UP AND START ACTUALLY UNDEFAMING SRILA PRABHUPADA. HIS LASHING OUT AT ME PROVED HIS INSINCERITY AND HIS ONLY CARING ABOUT NAME AND FAME.
Meantime, blasphemy of the pure devotee became more and more broadcast. PADA and company took up the poison issue with great enthusiasm, not perceiving that the public would be happy that Prabhupada was murdered if they simultaneously believed he was the leading supporter of tamal's and ravidra's and sdg's child abuse cult.
Turley hit the streets and tabloids, and pada joined in the chorus showing clearly his true colours and motivation: kick tamal off his seat and install his own blue-dyed jackal self in that supreme [jackal-ass] position. He himself stated on June 5 or 7, 2000 that "Why do i have to compromise with Turley and Nityananda."
Because you want to kill guru [via defamation] and become guru! Exactly as Ravindra and Rochford wish to do.
yeah, everything changed after Abhinandana heard about how i had been
viciously and repeatedly attacked at Wash DC  Ratha yatra, why?
Because, pada had remained silent about the poisoning issue for many
years - he, Yasoda, Nityananda and other self-interested [and uncaring?]
individuals. But now that Abhinandana, an apparent 'eyewitness' was
suddenly going ballistic over this, and had even stated to me on the
phone from Houston that he knew "lots of devotees knew Prabhupada had
complained he was being given poison!", and suddenly Abhi was to let the
cat out of the bag, he had the 'final tapes', he was going to the FBI,
he was threatening to go to India, to Indian Life Members, to the press,
to the government, etc.,etc., and furthermore he emphatically stated
over and over again that he absolutely forbade me to do anymore
protests, that i should go silent, trust his judgement and that he and i
would soon travel to India together and formulate a strategy of getting
financial backing from wealthy Hindus and life members, who would
certainly see the light and help us incite the Indian authorities to
help us solve the crime and extradite the evildoers, etc.- as soon as
pada and yasoda caught wind OF THIS, of WHICH WAY THE WIND WAS SUDDENLY
BLOWING, BOY OH BOY DID THEIR TUNE CHANGE. Suddenly they had access to
those final tapes, suddenly i couldn't have them for months, because
pada had to establish that he alone knew that Praabhupada had been
poisoned, he wanted to control the info on this, to release it at his
own discretion so that people would see pada as the savior of all the
devotees from ignorance and their leader and protector, etc. (as we've
seen him act with countless unfortunate and chroniicly gullible
creatures like NNV's former wife and many other mislead souls, who seek
shelter under pada's soothing and omniscient [ABOUT DEVOTEES' FAULTS?!]
yep, pada and associates saw the dangerous threat to their positions in
Abhinandana, who himself was demonstrating that he knew everything and
wanted to totally and freakishly [and anally] control it and own it,
since, after all he had "been there" in Vrindaban when Bhukticharue
shammy had "come out of Prabhupada's apartment in Vrindaban misty eyed,
telling me that Prabhupada had complained of being poisoned."
Yeah, Abhi was acting insanely, he had the tapes, and he wanted me
censored; pada was even worse - he knew i knew the truth and how i had
been importuning him and Nityananda and others for years to wake up and
see what was the root cause of the isgone insanity that sulocana was on
the verge of discovering when 'they' gunned him down, ie. tamal and
godbroze plan to kill guru and become goru. Puranjana was not about to
let this slide. No!!! he went into higear with his associate to usurp
total and exclusive credit "for the poison discovery." [although
privately, he had thanked me profusely for my work of exposing the
BUT VERY SOON THAT CREDIT_GIVING WOULD GO MOOT> SINCE pada didn't really
[even at that late date] believe in his heart that SP had indeed been
tortured unto death, he didn't really try so strneuously right away to
'own' the poison issue. But when he saw how devotees started responding,
and that they were looking to him for revelations on the issue, he
became enlivened and soon became the clearinghouse for all things poison
PADa and assoicates decided also that they needed to seem credible on
some slight level, so pada convinced his sick girlfriend (whose SSi
moneys were funding padas different mental/emotional addictions), to
carry a sign about SP's poisoning at the Aug. '97 LA RY. pada himself
was too scared to do such a thing. naturally, Brahma sampradaya dasi had
the sign taken from her hand after only a few minutes of walking with
it. [and pada did nothing but complain about it].
but after this episode, now pada figured he owned the poison issue, and
he went out of his way to pretend i didn't even exist as far as this
issue was concerned.
later he made an audio tape about it in which he was discussing it with
some english devotee as though he were the only one convinced of the
poisoning in the world. my name was conspicuous by its absence. pada
sent me copy of the tape, to "distribute"> though i was shocked that pd
was acting in this manner, i tried to cooperate with him anyway, hoping
he would settle down enuf to help me with the 'pre-turley expose'. as i
had earlier mentioned, i wanted pada and friends to immediately get the
message out to the newsmedia of Srila Prabhupada's being murdered by his
'loving, intimate disciples.' so that when child abuse scandals became
soon prominent ( AS HAD BEEN CLEAR TO US THAT SUCH THING WAS
INCREASINGLY IMMINENT - ABD WE WERE IN POSITION TO KNOW THIS SINCE WE
HAD FOR YEARS DEMONSTRATED AT RY FESTIVALS AND COULD DISCERN THE PULSE
BASED ON FIRST-HAND EXPERIENCE WITH THE HEAD-IN-SAND MISLEAD FOLLOWERS ,
INCLD'G GURUKULIES- OF RAVINDRA AND CO.), the
ravindra/tamalt/rochford-faction would have no one to scapegoat for
their demoniac actions, theories and coverups.
BUT PADA AND CO. DIDN'T CARE ABOUT SUCH IDEAS; they had the immediate
'cool new issue' of Prabhupada's poisoning. they saw how things were
quickly developing on that front, especially when some others in florida
came out with the whisper theories; suddenly the forensics and other
theories mesmerized the florida crew, pada, nityananda, etc.etc. and
sent them on a diversionary forensicks chase - as though the Messiah's
words weren't good enuf. OF COURSE< WHEN OTHERS ARE TRYING THEMSELVES
TO BE Messiah, it is not so astonishing that Krishna's< IE> God's
Representative's Words go unnoticed for many years or even lifetimes or
generations. [Prabhupada means also 'in place of God', and apparently
puranjana believes that pada means 'in place of PRABHUPADA']
INCISDENTALLY< I HAD EXHORTED PADA< YASODA AND NITYANANDA TO get the
hindi and bengali translated years before, so that they would have
"coNCLUSIVE PROOF" of sP's poisoning. i told them that i was certain
that SP spoke in these languages esp. in nov, 1977 to cover his
awareness of his tormentors' actions. but they only did that later to
show even more how they were the originators of the poison issue, and
were fast on the trail of the ass ass sins.
Meantime, the Turley "very nominal" and minimal attack on the Spiritual
Master approached nearer and nearer, and the padaophiles slept fastly.
but they certainly went into overdrive and overtime to demonize our
humble self for saying repeatedly:
you even will try to enjoy the spiritual master''s position by making
money and supporters over His death?!?!! have you rascals NO SHAME?
Nityananda, whose been making a nice living selling sdemong's vantassi
litter achores for a long while, books that murder Prabhupada, murder
Sulocanapada, murder the public's perception of the holy and pure
Messiah, the GOLDEN Avatara of Lord Caitanya's Mercy, is now working
with puranjana-PADA to make money [and supporters] on the Guru's demise,
only for profit adoration and fame? WHAT IS THIS DEMONIAC, RAKSHASHIC
MOOD? have you all not learned anything from ravindra's [ and nityananda
das'] false reform??? and etc.
such statements got me quickly blacklisted from the padaobedience
but my prognosticatory statements that they were knowingly selling out
their Guru [on poison issue] for fame and following, became soon
manifest on dec 9, 1998, when the precursor article to turley in NYT's
appeared, which was the first time we had ever witnessed the
blame-shifting of the gurukula meltdown onto the bona fide Spiritual
Master, SRILA PRABHUPADA. but, when we saw pada's total indifference,
and our exclaiming that he and yasoda should immediately do something
about ROCHFORD'S RAVINDRA-LIKE ATTACK, HE GOT REALLY MAD AND SHOUTED
THAT I SHOULD DEAL WITH IT MYSELF SINCE I LIVED OUT EAST AND SO DID
ROCHFORD. This was incredible to me since pada and yasoda etc. had
'cultivated' this rochshasha and had even forbade me from [years before]
calling him 'e. burke cockroachford' which i determined he was when he
refused to write a single word back to me in response to my farm report
and thousands of other pages of documents i sent the rascal, impostor
scholar [ie. ravindra boot-licker] over many years, a fact that revealed
coverup, since he purported to be studying the Hare Krishna movement,
and here i was, gradually revealing ALL THE DIRTY SECRETS OF THE
PSEUDO-LEADERS WHOM HE'D BEEN CONTACTING SINCE 1983 - MANY OF WHOM HE
FORMED CLOSEAND ENDURING RELATIONSHIPS WITH [AS MENTIONED BY HIMSELF IN
HIS BOOKS - INDEED, ROCHFORD HAD WORKED IN ISKCON EDUCATION DIRECTLY]
ANYWAY, PADA HAD BEEN IRATE YEARS BEFORE WHEN I HAD COME CLOSE TO
WRITING TO ROCHFORD CALLING HIM A COCKROACH FORD, ETC. NOW WHEN I
REMINDED HIM [PADA] OF HIS FALSE SOCIETY FRIENSHIP AND LOVE PARADIGM AND
THAT I HAD BEEN [as usual] RIGHT ABOUT ROCHFORD'S UNPRISTINE MOTIVES,
AND THAT NOW PADA COULD AND SHOULD ADMIT THEY WERE WRONG ALL ALONG TO
EMBRACE THE SNAKE, AND SHOULD APOLOGIZE TO ME PUBLICLY FOR ENCOURAGING
ME TO WRONGLY AVOID CRITICIZING SUCH AN IMPOSTOR; AND, FURTHERMORE,
SHOULD NOW TAKE THE RASCAL ROCHFORD SEVERELY TO TASK FOR HIS BLASPHEMOUS
STATEMENTS IN THE PRESS AGAINST SRILA PRABHUPADA, PADA BECAME VERY, VERY
RAGEFUL TOWARDS ME, AND STARTED SAYING I WAS AN SDG-OPHILE AND SUPPORTER
OF CHILD MOLESTORS, ETC.
unbelievable, considering i had exposed sdemong (Satsvarupa) as early as 1986, around
the exact time that Sulocana was, and this fact is brought out clearly
even in my 1996 trial with ISGONE, in which Baladeva V d was questioned
by my attorney regarding an incident in which sdg's secretary came to my
home seeking a donation for sdemong's book press, and i had chased him
away by telling him: "when sdg apologizes to the world for the cheating
that has gone on by all the false gurus, apologizes to Prabhupada and
the public etc., THEN I WILL GIVE ALL MY MONEY TO HIS BOOK FUND, not
until!" - which statement had also been made in the presence of my
former wife, Draupadi devi dasi.
Anyway, aside from moving out of isgone in early 1983 and exposing sdg
when Sulocana also was waking up to his obnoxious quality, i had
directly told SDG he was being a rascal on Dec. 30, 1992 at
Tejoprakash's house, when sdg had summoned me to explain why i had
written a book about ravindra's and co.'s cow and cowherd-abuse at
gita-niggardly [which face-to-face expose' was followed two days later
by a demonstration at an sdg pseudo-vyasapuja ceremony with over 100
guests present in the gitanagari temple room during mangal arti. [both
of these encounters had been predicated by a startling dream i had been
Graced with by Srila Prabhupada on Dec. 20, 1992, wherein HDG appeared
and frankly disclosed that: "your [pseudo] guru has fallen away, I WANT
YOU to fight this battle for ME!"
- this so-called dream took place the very night before i went to the
postoffice to distribute the packaged "Farm Reports" to the unsuspecting
isgone world, and i was still plagued by doubts that perhaps i might be
'offending devotees' by sending out such a document kicking on
ravindra's bogus regime. Prabhupada made it clear that i was indeed
meant to go thru with the obvious, and He would help me as supreme
Anyway, subsequently, puranjana got hold [i think from hansadutta] copy
of the farm report and he [WHOM, LIKE ABHINANDANA, I DID NOT PRIOR TO
HIS PHONE CALL AND PADA NEWSLETTER DEPICTING THE GITA NAGARI FARM REPORT
I'D WRITTEN, EVEN KNOW EXISTED IN THE WORLD] BEGAN TO ASSUME I WAS HIS
SUPPORTER, and assured me i was playing an "important role in THE [ie.
iskcon] reform movement." His friends also wrote me numerous letters in
the same vein. I was a very obedient supporter, also, because i was so
pleased that their was indeed a resistance movement. puranjana gave me
many ideas for signs and protests. these are all memorialised in
collages i made from photographs taken of the demonstrations i [usually]
single-handedly performed at gitanagari, NY, Wash DC, etc.. One
demonstration at GN, i had a sign withpada's words: HONK IF YOU'RE
AGAINST CMG; DON'T IF YOUR HEAD'S IN THE SAND!" i carried another in a
ry parade similar that pada also engineered. And, of course, pada's
name, address, phone and email all appeared in every flyer and collage i
distributed at these places. and videotape reveals my devoted complaince
with pada's idea, even though i did have some reservations on the
fanaticism he displayed. [funny how the language and slogans off
puranjana's that i adapted, were criticized by people who actiually
bought his message. today, also, i am criticized for my style, which
unfortunatley i imbibed from pada - though i take total responsibility
for foolishly allowing myself to be in any way influenced by this
consummate pretender. bad assoc.!
Anyway, sorry about the tangents; my point is this: i had faithfully
served pada's interests because i thought for some time that he was
sincerely into defending Prabhupada and exposing the evildoers; but
gradually, GRADually Prabhupada Himself revealed that pada ranjana was
only really interested in 'exposing the evildoers' not actually in
defending Srila Prabhupada! AND WHEN I EXPOSED HIM AND ASSOCIATES
FALSITY IN REGARDS THE NYTs Rochford/Laurie GOODSTEIN RAVINDRA "ISGONE"S
CHILD ABUSE IS PRABHUPADA"S FAULT"< HE DECIDED I SHOULD BE
'EXCOMMUNICATED" FROM THE REFORM i quickly became persona non grata as i
unrelentingly "called a snake a snake" [or a pada a pud]
so, there's no truth to any of pada's 'post-sanat-support' expose'. and
of course, there's all truth to my charge that these pada folks are
fully to blame for Prabhupada being blamed for the child abuse and etc.
They sanctioned [defacto] turley's blasphemy - it was nicely calculated,
calculated to help advance pada's [and nityananda's, etc.] cause.
more [sooner or] later